^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ARIHANT STEEL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL

Pet. Counsel

Pranjal Shukla

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	ARIHANT STEEL
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Aug 7, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1534 of 2022
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10467
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Parth Goswami, Advocate holding brief Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.09.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Sector- 8, State Goods & Service Tax, Bareilly as well as the impugned order dated 07.07.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal) 1st, State Goods & Service Tax, Bareilly. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being a registered dealer, in normal course of business, purchased the goods from authorized dealer through tax invoice and paid the due tax thereof. The goods were transported to M/s Awadh Transporter, Nanpara, bill has already been filed to which payment was made through banking channel. Thereafter, the petitioner claimed the Input Tax Credit, which has wrongly been rejected without ....