^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ARHAAN FERROUS AND NON FERROUS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OTHERS
(Andhra Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
HARINATH.N

Pet. Counsel

V Siddharth Reddy

Res. Counsel

Y V Anil Kumar

Y.n. Vivekananda

Petitioner / Applicant	ARHAAN FERROUS AND NON FERROUS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OTHERS
Court	Andhra Pradesh High Court
State	Andhra Pradesh
Date	Aug 7, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO: 31861/2023
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10498
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO Heard Sri V. Siddharth Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Y.V. Anil Kumar, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent and Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the CGST Act. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 14.10.2023 calling upon him to show cause as to why his registration should not be cancelled. The ground for such a course of action was recorded, is as follows: “Issues any invoice or bill without supply of goods and/or services in violation of the provisions of this Act, or the rules made there under leading to wrongful availment or utilization of input tax credit or refund of tax.” 3. The petitioner was given seven working days from the date of service of the said notice, to furnish his reply. The said notice also directed the petit....