Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

ANKIT MAHAJA vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

JAISHREE THAKUR
Pet. Counsel
Vikram Chaudhary
Rahil Mahajan
Ashish Aggrwal
Res. Counsel
H.s. Grewal

Petitioner / Applicant

ANKIT MAHAJA
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Mar 15, 2021
Order No.

CRM-M No.6891 of 2021 (O&M)

Citation

2021(3) TAXREPLY 4003
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.09 dated 21.08.2020 under Sections 7, 7A, 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Vigilance, SAS Nagar (Mohali). Learned senior counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner herein has been wrongly implicated in the said matter and is in custody since 24.12.2020. It is argued that the entire allegation in the FIR pertaining to the petitioner would be that he has tried to evade payment of GST on 'tobacco' in connivance with one Som Nath, owner of Sadhu Transport Co. In fact, the question of evasion of GST would not arise since e-way bill was generated albeit a little late and as on date, an amount of ₹ 12 lakhs has already been deposited towards GST. It is further argued that though he has been nominated as an accused in FIR No.9 of 2020, however, there is no allegatio....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)