Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

AMIT KUMAR AND OTHERS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Pet. Counsel
J.s. Bedi
Res. Counsel
Bhupender Beniwal

Petitioner / Applicant

AMIT KUMAR AND OTHERS
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Mar 31, 2021
Order No.

CRM-M-37794-2020, CRM-M-37853-2020,CRM-M-41424-2020 AND CRM-M-1155-2021

Citation

2021(3) TAXREPLY 4044
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

This order of mine shall dispose of the above-captioned petitions praying for the grant of regular bail in case bearing Complaint No.AC No.22 of 2020 dated 18.08.2020, registered under Sections 132(1) (b) (c) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amloh. As per the allegations contained in the aforesaid complaint, the petitioners had issued bogus bills showing false Input Tax Credit (ITC) (Payment of Tax to State Government) through bogus firms created by them. They have been accused of causing a loss of about ₹ 8.73 crore and ₹ 7.74 crore, respectively, to the Government by way of tax evasion, by creating a chain of firms and showing sales and purchase without there being any actual and physical transactions. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case inasmuch as there is no allegation of generation o....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S