^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

AMAZE POWER & OTHERS vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST RANGE - V & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S. SIVAGNANAM
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Pet. Counsel

Sandip Choraria

Rishav Manna

Res. Counsel

K. K. Maiti

Tapan Bhanja

Petitioner / Applicant	AMAZE POWER & OTHERS
Respondent	SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST RANGE - V & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Jul 9, 2024
Order No.	M. A. T. 1111 of 2024 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 + CAN 2 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10187
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) In Re: IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 1. We have heard Mr. Sandip Choraria, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. K. K. Maiti, learned advocate for the respondent/CGST authority. 2. There is delay of 11 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition and we find that sufficient cause has been shown for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation. 3. IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. In Re. M.A.T. 1111 of 2024 4. The appellants, who are the writ petitioners and are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Bench dated 22nd March, 2024 in W.P.A. 6431 of 2024, by which the learned Single Bench declined to grant any interim order. 5. After hearing the learned advocates for the parties and perusing the order impugned in the writ petition dated 28th November, 2023, we find that there is no scope for granting ....