^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ALUKKA GOLD PALACE vs. STATE TAX OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF GST, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

P.B.SURESH KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Harisankar V. Menon

Meera V.menon

K.krishna

Res. Counsel

Thushara James

N.nagaresh

P.r.sreejith

Petitioner / Applicant	ALUKKA GOLD PALACE
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF GST, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Apr 6, 2018
Order No.	WP (C). No. 35333 of 2017
Citation	2018(4) TAXREPLY 3012
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
On account of a mistake committed by the petitioner during 2009 in providing the PAN number of another firm for the purpose of obtaining registration under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act ('the Act'), the request of the petitioner for registration under the GST statutes were delayed and were granted only with effect from 12.08.2017. The grievance of the petitioner is that since the GST statutes came into being from 01.07.2017, the petitioner is unable to comply with the statutory requirements in relation to the business for the period from 01.07.2017 to 12.08.2017. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions in this regard, in the writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader as also the learned Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent. 3. To err is human. As such, it is obligatory for the respondents concerned to make appropriate provisions to tackle issues of the instant nature as well, so as to enable p....