^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ALUFAB ORES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRADES AND TAXES & ANOTHER
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA

Pet. Counsel

Arvind Duggal

Gulshan Sharma

Res. Counsel

Karn Bhardwaj

Shubham Singh

Petitioner / Applicant	ALUFAB ORES PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	DEPARTMENT OF TRADES AND TAXES & ANOTHER
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Aug 13, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 11202/2024 CM APPL. 46329/2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10584
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 13.02.2024 (hereafter the impugned order), passed by the appellate authority rejecting the petitioner’s appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act)/ the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the DGST Act), against an order passed by the proper officer. 4. The petitioner had preferred the said appeal against an order dated 28.02.2023 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order) whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled. The appellate authority found that the appeal was beyond the period of limitation and accordingly, rejected the same. 5. The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by the impugned cancellation order cancelling its GST registration. 6. The petitioner was registered with th....