^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

AJAYRAJ CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & AnOTHER vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX & OTHERS
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SANJEEV SACHDEVA
RAVINDER DUDEJA

Pet. Counsel

Jitin Singhal

Res. Counsel

R. Ramachandran

Petitioner / Applicant	AJAYRAJ CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & AnOTHER
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX & OTHERS
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	May 9, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 4145/2024 & CM APPL. 16942/2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9653
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns Order in Original dated 19.12.2023 whereby the show cause notice dated 28.04.2021 has been disposed of. 2. Reference may be had to paragraph 21 of the impugned order which records as under:- 21. Written Submission of the Noticee: The Noticee did not submit any written reply in response to Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice No. 27 /JC/2022-23 dated 28.04.2022 issued by the Joint Commissioner CGST, Delhi East. 3. We may, however, note that personal hearing opportunity was granted to the petitioner repeatedly. However, none appears for the petitioner. The impugned order notes that as neither any reply was received from the noticee nor any one attended the hearing. The matter was proceeded further. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent concedes that a reply was filed by the petitioner, however, appears to have escaped the notice of the Adjudicating Authority when the final order was passed. 5.....