^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ABDUL SAMAD MOHAMED INAYATHULLAH vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND C. EXICSE, TIRUCHIRAPPALL
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.PUGALENDHI

Pet. Counsel

N.sudailamuthu

Res. Counsel

S.ragaventhirini

Petitioner / Applicant	ABDUL SAMAD MOHAMED INAYATHULLAH
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND C. EXICSE, TIRUCHIRAPPALL
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 29, 2023
Order No.	WP(MD)No.8016 of 2023 And WMP(MD)No.7445 of 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 8128
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed as against the cancellation of the petitioner's GSTN Registration No.33ANLPM1250C1ZI by the respondent vide order dated 25.06.2020. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a vegetable exporter and enrolled under central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner has been provided with GSTN Registration No. 33ANLPM1250C1ZI. He further submits that the petitioner has engaged a part time accountant to file returns periodically. While so, the petitioner was issued with the show cause notice dated 09.01.2020 to appear for enquiry, however without any specific date for his appearance. While so, without hearing him the impugned order has been passed by the respondent cancelling his registration under the GST Act. The petitioner has also filed an application for revocation of the order, but the same also was rejected vide order dated 20.11.2020. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits tha....