Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

A.B. PRINT PACK vs. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND ANR.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S. RAVINDRA BHAT
A. K. CHAWLA
Pet. Counsel
M.p. Arora
Res. Counsel
Sanjeev Narula
Abhishek Ghai
Abhay Prakash Sahay

Petitioner / Applicant

A.B. PRINT PACK

Respondent THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND ANR.
Court Delhi High Court
State

Delhi

Date Aug 29, 2018
Order No.

W.P.(C) 9059/2018, CM APPL. 34887/2018

Citation

2018(8) TAXREPLY 2914
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel on behalf of the Revenue. The petitioner’s grievance is that the credit of input tax in relation to capital goods which was permitted inadvertently in the TRANS I Form filed on 27.12.2017 (to the tune of ₹ 12,70,097/-) has not been taken into account and therefore, seeks a direction that the credit of input tax to the tune of ₹ 15,82,821/- on the stock of goods which could not be claimed under TRANS II, due to technical glitches in the GST portal should be considered. We have heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner asserts that the grievance with respect to the subject matter of this petition i.e. the input credit under TRANS I and credit of input tax on the stock of goods, which could not be claimed on account of errors i.e. negligence on the part of the Accountant as well as alleged technical glitches should be examined in the light of the representations. The petitioner has alleged that the representation/grievan....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S