^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

A. GANESH vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER TAJPURA & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

I. Dinesh

Res. Counsel

K. Vasanthamala

Petitioner / Applicant	A. GANESH
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER TAJPURA & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 26, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 11251 of 2024, W. M. P. Nos. 12349, 12350 & 12351 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10844
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 10.10.2023 is challenged on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order until the petitioner was informed that his bank account was frozen, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal which was confirmed by the impugned order relates to reversal of Input Tax Credit on account of belated filing of returns. Since the show cause notice and order were uploaded on the GST portal but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, he submits that the petitioner was unaware of these proceedings. He makes a request that the petitioner be provided an opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits, by further submitting that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 4. Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, ac....